The Day After[1] is a 1983
docudrama staring Jason Robards, Jobeth Williams, Steven Guttenberg, John
Cullum, and John Lithgow.
It is the
story of surviving a full-scale nuclear attack against the United States by the Soviet
Union during the heightened Cold War hostility of the Reagan era.
It takes you from the everyday life of a small university hospital in Lawrence , Kansas
to the chaotic nightmare following World War III. The movie addresses all the
basic topics of survival in a nuclear war:
·
Sanitation
·
Lighting
·
Heating
·
Medical response
·
The destruction of the social fabric.
This movie first
aired on ABC’s Sunday Night Movie in 1983.[2] It was designed as a
contemporary version of the 1959 book by Pat Franks, Alas Babylon .[3] It was
specifically designed for its shock value to alert the people of the United States
to the dangers of the arms race in what turned out to be the last days of the
Cold War. When first aired, it was followed by a panel discussion by scientific
experts which included the late Carl Sagan.[4] His analogy is that the
world is like a room full of gasoline and one careless match could set it all
off. The panel discussion is now part of history, existing only in ABC’s
archives (if it exists at all), and the memory of those who saw it.
The movie
has once again popped up on local supermarket shelves (it is interesting to
note that the jacket on the current DVD release refers to the nuclear arms of
the United States
as “WMDs,” a term that, for the most part, did not exist in the common vocabulary
in 1983.) This movie is just one of the few titles that address the threat of
the last Cold War, and the cataclysmic clash that was barely averted, time and
again, from 1945 to 1989.
While there
are some technical flaws in The
Day After (not the least of which is the sudden, miraculous appearance of
live horses after survivors emerge from shelters), it still remains a chilling
reminder of the total devastation which threatened the nation during the Cold
War era.
What should
never be forgotten is that the government of the United
States , as far back as the Kennedy Administration,
concluded that the people of the United States , you and I, were disposable
should the Cold War turn hot. That is not a whole lot different from Rumsfeld’s
proclamation that the citizens were more vulnerable than the military in the
current “War on Terror.”
From the
mid-1960s to the end of the Cold War and the eventual dismantling of SAC[5] (the Strategic Air
Command), the United States
government slowly but steadily dismantled the civilian population protection
systems. First to go were the various stocked, public fallout shelters. This
was followed some time later by the dismantling of the Nike Zeus, and Nike Ajax
sites which protected most metropolitan areas around the nation (Nike Park in
Chicago was
once one such installation – and you thought it was named after the athletic
shoe.) The final move was the dismantling of the old, regionally controlled,
Civil Defense network and its replacement by the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA).[6]
With the
creation of FEMA, the citizens of the United States were promised a swift and
timely response should any region of the nation suffer a natural disaster or an
attack against the U.S. Understand that FEMA’s original charter was to respond
to an attack against the U.S., just as Homeland Security does now. Since FEMA
did exist to respond to an attack against the United States , one has to wonder
why DHS (Department of Homeland Security) was created in the first place.
FEMA, as it
morphed into a peacetime disaster relief agency, has worked questionably in the
best of times. Under the current administration, its record has been dismal.
This past week (ending April 29, 2006)[7] there have been calls from
Congress to dismantle FEMA. Rather than disband FEMA, I’d suggest that the
whole DHS fiasco be scrapped. Rather than continuing to federalize the
emergency response structure, the money would be better spent to train the
local response teams.
Under the
local plan, should a disaster strike, a political hack in Washington , D.C.
would not have to be brought up to speed as to exactly what his
responsibilities were. I always thought that the Conservatives were supporters
of smaller government, not larger government agencies leading to an incompetent
Police State. I guess that was true of the pre World War II conservatives; I’ve
not seen it in the history of the nation since then.
The Day After is fiction,
addressing the issue of a full scale war. The story was envisioned by Edward
Hume and directed by Nicholas Meyer. What we have seen from FEMA, in the week
after Katrina, was conceived by Brown and directed by Bush. Even though it was
reality; it was more chilling than the fiction of The Day After. We are, in this era of more security, less secure and
definitely on our own. I sure hope you can afford it. I can’t.
In the United States of America today, I can be on some watch list for just posting these questions.
[1]
Wikipedia: The Day After, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Day_After
[2]
Wikipedia: The Day After: Reaction, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Day_After#Reaction
[3] Wikipedia: Alas, Babylon,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alas_Babylon
[4]
Wikipedia: FEMA, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FEMA
[5]
Wikipedia: Strategic Air Command, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_Air_Command
[6]
Wikipedia: United States Department of Homeland Security, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Department_of_Homeland_Security
[7]
Cox News Service, Friday, April 28, 2006, Julia Malone, Ken Herman, Senators
want to shut down 'dysfunctional' FEMA; ABC News, Apr 27, 2006, Lara Jakes Jordan ,
Senate Panel
Says FEMA Is Beyond Repair; Los Angeles Times, Friday, Apr. 28, 2006,
Johanna Neuman,
Congress, White House clash over FEMA's future
Comments
Post a Comment